Tuesday, August 30, 2016

lou-tzu vs Machiavelli





Lao-tzu                                                                 VS.                                           Machiavelli

Lao-tzu


Lao-tzu

  • He believed people were equal  
  • The king is to stand in the shadows and let the people make decisions.
  • A king should be loved and feared, but not despised
  • He believed that the world is sacred and cannot be changed.
  • There is a time for everything.
  • Emphasizes that a king should let the world revolve around him and he should not change it.
  • Weapons are to be used for protection, not war.
  • The world, and people govern.
  • "Governing a large country is like frying a small fish. You spoil it with too much poking." verse 60.

Machiavelli

  • Thought that politicians shouldn't be friendly and kind.
  • Effective leading comes from a dark person
  • You cant be a good person and a good politician.
  • A prince should be unapproachably strict.
  • A prince should be feared, not loved.
  • Virtu' - wisdom- strategy-strength-bravery-ruthlessness.
  • "Criminal virtue"- waging wars and killings without being named bad.
  • Effectiveness and niceness cant go together.
These brief notes only touch on what Machiavelli and lao-tzu believed in. They were two totally different characters. Lao-tzu is someone that I would like the best. He is nice and considerate; however, he doesn't get anything done on his own. His people do the work for him. Machiavelli is ruthless and arrogant. He only want what is best for the politician.
       I can see Lao-tzu being really laid back and listening to classical music.



I can see Machiavelli being a hard core war general and listening to war music